﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: linear workflow discussion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fxguide.com/qt/1576/linear-workflow-discussion/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fxguide.com/qt/1576/linear-workflow-discussion</link>
	<description>quick news and comments about the vfx industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:22:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/qt/1576/linear-workflow-discussion/comment-page-1#comment-5230</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/qt/?p=1576#comment-5230</guid>
		<description>Thanks, very informative and to the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, very informative and to the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Summers</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/qt/1576/linear-workflow-discussion/comment-page-1#comment-4772</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/qt/?p=1576#comment-4772</guid>
		<description>Can we call this linear workspace &quot;gamma 1&quot;? I think it sounds cool and futuristic and it avoids the confusion of linear vs non-linear editing and people calling gamma 2.2 linear. Since non-linear editing has become common place I think the word linear has gotten a negative connotation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we call this linear workspace &#8220;gamma 1&#8243;? I think it sounds cool and futuristic and it avoids the confusion of linear vs non-linear editing and people calling gamma 2.2 linear. Since non-linear editing has become common place I think the word linear has gotten a negative connotation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/qt/1576/linear-workflow-discussion/comment-page-1#comment-4704</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/qt/?p=1576#comment-4704</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the very informative discussion. I been researching a lot about this issue ever since I saw Stu&#039;s post sometime back last year. Though I haven&#039;t been able to put this into practice at where I work because of the common scenarios  mentioned in this discussion. 

Anyway here are few couple of links which I found very interesting and helped me to get my head around this issue.

Very simple and easy to understand workflow
http://www.djx.com.au/blog/2008/09/13/linear-workflow-and-gamma/

Conversion between &quot;linear floating point&quot; and the more common &quot;sRGB bytes&quot; workflow by Bill Spitzak developed for Digital Domain 
http://mysite.verizon.net/spitzak/conversion/calibrate.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the very informative discussion. I been researching a lot about this issue ever since I saw Stu&#8217;s post sometime back last year. Though I haven&#8217;t been able to put this into practice at where I work because of the common scenarios  mentioned in this discussion. </p>
<p>Anyway here are few couple of links which I found very interesting and helped me to get my head around this issue.</p>
<p>Very simple and easy to understand workflow<br />
<a href="http://www.djx.com.au/blog/2008/09/13/linear-workflow-and-gamma/" rel="nofollow">http://www.djx.com.au/blog/2008/09/13/linear-workflow-and-gamma/</a></p>
<p>Conversion between &#8220;linear floating point&#8221; and the more common &#8220;sRGB bytes&#8221; workflow by Bill Spitzak developed for Digital Domain<br />
<a href="http://mysite.verizon.net/spitzak/conversion/calibrate.html" rel="nofollow">http://mysite.verizon.net/spitzak/conversion/calibrate.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Heusser</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/qt/1576/linear-workflow-discussion/comment-page-1#comment-4659</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Heusser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/qt/?p=1576#comment-4659</guid>
		<description>Stu Maschwitz is mentioned in the podcast and has posted about the podcast on his ProLost blog 

http://prolost.com/blog/2009/9/30/passing-the-linear-torch.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stu Maschwitz is mentioned in the podcast and has posted about the podcast on his ProLost blog </p>
<p><a href="http://prolost.com/blog/2009/9/30/passing-the-linear-torch.html" rel="nofollow">http://prolost.com/blog/2009/9/30/passing-the-linear-torch.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resource of the Week 9/30/2009 &#124; VizWorld.com</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/qt/1576/linear-workflow-discussion/comment-page-1#comment-4657</link>
		<dc:creator>Resource of the Week 9/30/2009 &#124; VizWorld.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/qt/?p=1576#comment-4657</guid>
		<description>[...] been advocating this for years and it&#8217;s slowly gained traction in the industry, and this week fxguide interviewed &#8220;Master Zap&#8221; of Mental Images and discusses &#8220;linear workflow&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been advocating this for years and it&#8217;s slowly gained traction in the industry, and this week fxguide interviewed &#8220;Master Zap&#8221; of Mental Images and discusses &#8220;linear workflow&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
