Comments on: Red Centre #5

By: namekyoyo

namekyoyo — Mon, 19 May 2008 14:52:47 +0000

Heres the Link guys. Ian helped me to find the link LOL.

http://www.fxguide.com/redcentre

By: jmalmsten

jmalmsten — Thu, 15 May 2008 10:07:52 +0000

Ah, that explains it even though it was really confusing to read the article and find no link to the audio on site… I knew I had listened to some before, but couldn’t for the life of me find where. Surely I’m not the only one with this confusion or am I wrong?

oh well… since I find no other simple way of remembering where they are I’ll just bookmark it. (being an avid resistant against almost anything apple, I won’t use iTunes)

Why isn’t there a link to the podcasts on these quick-takes? or again. is it me that’s blind?

By: Mike Seymour

Mike Seymour — Mon, 12 May 2008 20:42:38 +0000

So fixed the monstercine link… thanks

Re podcasts audio… as with ALL fxguide podcasts you can use itunes or go to
http://www.fxguide.com/fxpodcast.html

to listen from our site.
enjoy

Mike

By: Tom Dearden

Tom Dearden — Mon, 12 May 2008 20:39:13 +0000

In keeping with the theme – I think there are one too few double-yoos in the Monster Cine link, too …

By: jmalmsten

jmalmsten — Mon, 12 May 2008 16:20:57 +0000

I must be blind or stupid or both… I’m clicking away on every link I can find on this page, but I cannot seem to find any way to make the audio play… What am I doing wrong?

By: Mike Seymour

Mike Seymour — Fri, 09 May 2008 21:53:51 +0000

Actually we have an entire class on rating cameras in fxphd.com – we rate a Sony and the RED and our methodology came out at around 320 ISO. If you allow for the ‘hidden’ 1/3 – 1/2 stop in the highlights

Mike

By: Jeff Heusser

Jeff Heusser — Fri, 09 May 2008 14:33:37 +0000

fixed viewfactor link, thanks. Jeff

By: David L

David L — Fri, 09 May 2008 12:46:35 +0000

Thanks for the program

Show notes viewfactor home page link I believe is .net not .com

By: jason W

jason W — Fri, 09 May 2008 11:13:26 +0000

Thanks Rich, I totally agree with you. Anecdotally I’d say yes its a camera better rated at 200, no idea why its rated one way or the other, but hey I know a lot of DP’s who rate film stock different to what Kodak or Fuji say so I guess its all a personal preference.

By: Rich Schaefer (richcam1)

Rich Schaefer (richcam1) — Fri, 09 May 2008 05:18:00 +0000

Awesome show guys! I am a DP with a Red (and 9 other cameras) I have noticed my Red camera is no where near it’s supposed 320ASA. When the camera is set at the standard 320 asa it is sensitive like a 200 asa imager. I have used incident metering, spot metering and comparison to multiple DSLRs (comparing histograms). I have also tested indoor and outdoor shoots. Everything indicates my Red camera is 200asa sensitive at it’s 320asa setting. What is up with this? Is anyone else worried about this?

Keep up the good work!
Cheers,
Rich