<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Autodesk Announcements @ SIGGRAPH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/autodesk-announcements-siggraph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/autodesk-announcements-siggraph/</link>
	<description>vfx, mograph, and production news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:41:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/autodesk-announcements-siggraph/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20167#comment-306</guid>
		<description>According to my readings it was actually Apple who changed from allowing two different code bases (carbon, cocoa) to only using cocoa at the last minute. They had been working on carbon64 which WAS supported by the likes of Adobe and probably others and then at the last minute Apple decided to only support cocoa, leaving the companies to change much of the code in their apps. So while you may love your beloved Apple, as I do as well, this was squarely on Apple&#039;s shoulders not the Adobe, Autodesk manufacturers. It&#039;s not an issue of laziness. And while I would like 64 bit apps I&#039;d rather them take the time they need to do it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to my readings it was actually Apple who changed from allowing two different code bases (carbon, cocoa) to only using cocoa at the last minute. They had been working on carbon64 which WAS supported by the likes of Adobe and probably others and then at the last minute Apple decided to only support cocoa, leaving the companies to change much of the code in their apps. So while you may love your beloved Apple, as I do as well, this was squarely on Apple&#8217;s shoulders not the Adobe, Autodesk manufacturers. It&#8217;s not an issue of laziness. And while I would like 64 bit apps I&#8217;d rather them take the time they need to do it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dd</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/autodesk-announcements-siggraph/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>dd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20167#comment-303</guid>
		<description>&quot;So while leopard is a </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So while leopard is a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zander</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/autodesk-announcements-siggraph/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Zander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20167#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Let me start by saying I&#039;m a huge mac fan boy, that said:

Mac when they were coming out with leopard said that they would be porting 1 version of their code to 64 bits...then about 3 maybe 4 months before the release of leopard...they changed their mind to a different version of code that is a huge PITA. Most devolopers don&#039;t know it well, or don&#039;t want to be bothered with coding in it. Snow leopard is bringing back what they had originally said and more devs will beable to to code 64bit mac programs.

So while leopard is a &quot;64 bit os&quot; no one wants to go 64 with their code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me start by saying I&#8217;m a huge mac fan boy, that said:</p>
<p>Mac when they were coming out with leopard said that they would be porting 1 version of their code to 64 bits&#8230;then about 3 maybe 4 months before the release of leopard&#8230;they changed their mind to a different version of code that is a huge PITA. Most devolopers don&#8217;t know it well, or don&#8217;t want to be bothered with coding in it. Snow leopard is bringing back what they had originally said and more devs will beable to to code 64bit mac programs.</p>
<p>So while leopard is a &#8220;64 bit os&#8221; no one wants to go 64 with their code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ante</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/autodesk-announcements-siggraph/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Ante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20167#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Can someone explain why Autodesk do not come out with Maya 2009 64-bit for Mac OS X?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain why Autodesk do not come out with Maya 2009 64-bit for Mac OS X?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 11/12 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fxguide.com

Served from: www.fxguide.com @ 2012-02-09 01:39:47 -->
