Our first IBC episode is up with news from the show regarding Autodesk. The company today introduced Flame Premium, which is effectively a bundle of Flame, Smoke Advanced (with an Action that includes all Flame creative tools), and Lustre. The software package is list priced at $129,000 in the states. Upgrades to the premium version from “regular” Flame are $10,000 and $25,000 to upgrade from Smoke Advanced, Flint, or Lustre.

fxguidetv episode #91 has interviews with Mark Hamaker and Marcus Schioler from Autodesk discussing the reasons behind the move. We also speak with Tim Crean, flame artist and partner at Suspect in New York City, and Chris Hengeveld, a smoke editor at Northern Lights Post. They discuss why this move is interesting from both a business and artist perspective.

In addition, the episode also includes our annual overview of the of the IBC flame/smoke extension release with Philippe Soeiro, Autodesk’s Lead Product Designer on the products. If you’d like to see the full-length versions of the overview, visit the fxguide YouTube channel for uncut versions.

Visit the fxguidetv page for direct fxguidetv downloads and RSS feed links. To be notified automatically and have the episodes downloaded in iTunes, subscribe via this link.


Thanks so much for reading our article.

We've been a free service since 1999 and now rely on the generous contributions of readers like you. If you'd like to help support our work, please join the hundreds of others and become an fxinsider member.

20 Responses to fxguidetv from IBC: Flame Premium + Full Length 2011×1 Feature Videos

  1. Brian,

    Nice one ;)

    Autodesk will be back on the track with this package.

    Posted by Sean on
  2. This is a fantastic move by Autodesk. In essence they will be selling Lustre/Smoke combo for $10K if you already have a flame. That is awesome. NYC commercial scene is in for some good changes. :)

    Posted by yohance on
  3. Agreed. We’re super-excited over Flame Premium here in Chicago!

    Posted by brianH on
  4. How come my post was censored?? Looks like no one can’t criticize websites sponsors.

    ENOG.

    Posted by Enog on
    • No conspiracy theory. Was cleaning out posts about the YouTube videos not having audio (because I fixed that) and deleted yours by accident.

      Would have been fine to just ask instead of jumping to ridiculous conclusions….thanks.

      Posted by John Montgomery on
  5. YAY!! YUV Blur, I cannot tell you how many clients ask for the ‘Henry’ blur…..

    Posted by ChrisbiLoura on
  6. OK John, Sorry.

    Posted by ENOG on
  7. It’s the best news since 10 years, “will be selling Lustre/Smoke combo”
    All of us here in Europe are waiting for them on the same machine !
    But not on Linux ):
    Is there a light to see that best team of the world, one day on OSX ?

    Posted by quiete on
  8. Slowly it (the Flame) is getting nearer and nearer to our facility…and since we`ve been evaluating Smoke it`s an even more interesting package…adding Lustre to the whole deal makes it nearly irresistible

    Posted by Kalone on
  9. Oh Please just focus on real improvement , phillip

    This new package is awesome (2011 , flame premium , Lustre …. )
    but you really need to improve some feature , FBX , Light ,Shadows , Stereo , Disparity … Stereo
    because is actually very so so
    The gradient , blur , X1 come on … ok

    anyway good job

    Mais vous pouvez faire encore mieux …

    G

    Posted by gabreil on
  10. Without a doubt, it’s nice to have access to all the premium software packages. But in reality, how many people out there are well-versed enough to be a “one man/woman band?” Merging the abilities that Flame has into Smoke would be obvious. Adding Lustre is nice, but I find the business model a bit puzzling. Anyone remember Quantel’s “Maya on Quantel” software offering?

    Posted by Dr. Zillman on
  11. IBC 2010
    By any chance, someone knows why the AREA TV – On Demand dooesn’t work ?
    thanks in advc

    Posted by quiete on
  12. I think when looking at Flame premium you need to take into account around $1k a year in subscription fees, plus the addition costs for Burn, plus the $10,000 for SapphireSparks, Plus Hardware, Plus……………………………

    And given it’s all on the one box it’s not like you can run three jobs at once (one Flame, One Smoke, One Lustre) to cover the additional costs.

    I’m finding really hard to see any real benefits…..

    Posted by qwertyKeyboard on
  13. I think it’s an easy financial decision actually, since having 3 flame suites that can now act as editorial, or grading, or comp (assuming you have the systems installed) for a fraction of the cost prior to Premium.. granted, the license doesn’t work across 3 separate machines, but there will be times that 3 rooms need to work on VFX, or maybe 2 rooms are grading while one is conforming.. if you don’t have endless space to install suites, it becomes easy to do the math.

    Posted by Glenn Capps on
  14. But why not just grade in Flame?? Why not edit in FCP where you have a much stonger freelance pool?? I can see the advantages from Autodesks side as a lot of people will jump on it thinking they have an advantage giving Autodesk a large cash hit.

    Posted by qwertykeyboard on
  15. AND ANOTHER THING!! (I say Jokingly….) If they had of brought out a version of Smoke with a Full batch and a Lustre Module/Node so you don’t have to jump between apps, now that would be cutting edge and worth buying.

    ……………………………………………

    Posted by qwertykeyboard on
  16. I think you might be missing something. If this upgrade cost the same as buying all 3 products separately, it would be a terrible, terrible deal. It’s not an extra $180,000 (guesstimate of $90K for Smoke Advanced and $90K for Lustre), though…it’s $10K. Yes, there may be hardware upgrade costs involved, but you’d need those eventually anyway.

    As a Flame artist who also knows Smoke pretty well, I’m really excited about Flame Premium. I love reels for compositing, but vastly prefer Smoke’s Editdesk and timeline for “lighter” work like finishing and mild color correction. If the new “Smoke Premium” had Flame’s caching in it, I would probably switch to it for 100% of my work. I totally agree with your “Lustre Node” idea!

    If you think Flame is a grading powerhouse, you’ve never worked with clients that are used to grading on a DaVinci or Baselight. You can create any look imaginable, but it’s pretty easy to bog the system down with rendering.

    Sapphire shouldn’t cost any more, as the price in the past for a sapphire flame license has been the same as a flame/smoke. I haven’t talked to their sales dept about it yet, though.

    Posted by brianH on
  17. Totally agree with your comment about Smokes desk top, I use both systems as well and much prefer Smokes superior desktop.

    So if your saying its better to grade in lustre than Flame, which I’m sure it is, do you need to also shell out for a grading panel for the lustre or is it included in the price??

    I’m just vastly disappointed they did not bring out one product that did everything instead.

    Come on Autodesk you need to LEAD by example, and not be LEAD.

    I tend to agree with Gabriel, Mais vous pouvez faire encore mieux, and fix stuff like Paint, BFX, cache, 3DBlur…………

    Posted by qwertykeyboard on
    • I’ve worked with some very respected film colorists who’ve worked on big hollywood films and won’t touch a grading panel.. They just use a mouse and keyboard. So I wouldn’t worry about buying a grading panel for lustre, it’s a matter of preference.

      Posted by noone on
    • We’ve made improvements to the 3D Blur node in this extension. New modes were added and we worked on improving the performance (although we’re still not totally happy with it and would like to improve it again in a future release)

      Posted by warrenf on

Leave a Reply