<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New RED Brains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/new-red-brains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/new-red-brains/</link>
	<description>vfx, mograph, and production news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:41:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Pollichek</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/new-red-brains/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Pollichek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20292#comment-460</guid>
		<description>fxguide why are you a commercial mouthpiece for Red?

Who cares about an announcement for something that is most likely take the better part of a year (or even years) from existing????  Let alone working.  Hello, how many people still have a Red One that turns itself off unexpectedly 7 or 8 times a shooting day?  Rolling shutter ugliness?  Dropping frames while shooting handheld.  The Red One is a crap camera.  

I don&#039;t know why anyone thinks that just because there are impressive specs that these cameras will be any different.  A $500 Canon HDV camera has better dynamic range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fxguide why are you a commercial mouthpiece for Red?</p>
<p>Who cares about an announcement for something that is most likely take the better part of a year (or even years) from existing????  Let alone working.  Hello, how many people still have a Red One that turns itself off unexpectedly 7 or 8 times a shooting day?  Rolling shutter ugliness?  Dropping frames while shooting handheld.  The Red One is a crap camera.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why anyone thinks that just because there are impressive specs that these cameras will be any different.  A $500 Canon HDV camera has better dynamic range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: love</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/new-red-brains/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20292#comment-453</guid>
		<description>28k to do a good a lense focus point can be more hard!!
Maybe 28k on baselight are already support? only 7 x 4k image  ;) is not as much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>28k to do a good a lense focus point can be more hard!!<br />
Maybe 28k on baselight are already support? only 7 x 4k image  <img src='http://cdn.fxguide.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  is not as much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: majik</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/new-red-brains/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>majik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20292#comment-458</guid>
		<description>@ yohance
&quot;I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ yohance<br />
&#8220;I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yohance</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/new-red-brains/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>yohance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20292#comment-455</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been waiting on a digital camera that would make the Imax camera obsolete. Looking forward to getting my hands on some 8K plus Redcode for color grading.
Scratch Baby!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been waiting on a digital camera that would make the Imax camera obsolete. Looking forward to getting my hands on some 8K plus Redcode for color grading.<br />
Scratch Baby!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CitizenZ</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/new-red-brains/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>CitizenZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20292#comment-457</guid>
		<description>So from somewhere around $3,000US or less on up you have the ability to do everything from web shows to  IMAX(+) stuff.  The camera or budget is no longer the limiting factor.  I have been trying to think of something that RED can&#039;t do at a higher resolution and MUCH lower price than what&#039;s available.

Clearly 28k is going to be for those hugely cinematic features and documentaries.  No you probably won&#039;t edit it on laptop but the prospect of this wasn&#039;t around yesterday.

This is rich stuff.  They even have autofocus available on the Full Frame &quot;brains&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So from somewhere around $3,000US or less on up you have the ability to do everything from web shows to  IMAX(+) stuff.  The camera or budget is no longer the limiting factor.  I have been trying to think of something that RED can&#8217;t do at a higher resolution and MUCH lower price than what&#8217;s available.</p>
<p>Clearly 28k is going to be for those hugely cinematic features and documentaries.  No you probably won&#8217;t edit it on laptop but the prospect of this wasn&#8217;t around yesterday.</p>
<p>This is rich stuff.  They even have autofocus available on the Full Frame &#8220;brains&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/new-red-brains/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20292#comment-456</guid>
		<description>The 28K 617 will be mostly used for stills... however people really need use their imagination once in a while. 28K means motion picture digital backlots or, 100+ HD displays cropped from one source or.............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 28K 617 will be mostly used for stills&#8230; however people really need use their imagination once in a while. 28K means motion picture digital backlots or, 100+ HD displays cropped from one source or&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Hummelstrand</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/new-red-brains/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Hummelstrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20292#comment-459</guid>
		<description>I was hoping for a camera body that would do 2K or more at at least 90 fps with a still camera lens mount and shallow depth-of-field-look, and at least same stills resolution that my Canon 30D has. I guess I&#039;ll have to wait another couple of years...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping for a camera body that would do 2K or more at at least 90 fps with a still camera lens mount and shallow depth-of-field-look, and at least same stills resolution that my Canon 30D has. I guess I&#8217;ll have to wait another couple of years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justafas</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/new-red-brains/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Justafas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20292#comment-461</guid>
		<description>28K interesting, 261 Megapixel - 1 frame  ??? 
ok you can do it, but where you gona fit this ? 
10 min. of matterial ~ 300 GB ??  is it true ?
and what, now you can shoot new video from space about ant live ? (+ 300 mm lens):)
i would like to see color grading of 28000 x 9334.
it`s comming time to REDmac or iRED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>28K interesting, 261 Megapixel &#8211; 1 frame  ???<br />
ok you can do it, but where you gona fit this ?<br />
10 min. of matterial ~ 300 GB ??  is it true ?<br />
and what, now you can shoot new video from space about ant live ? (+ 300 mm lens):)<br />
i would like to see color grading of 28000 x 9334.<br />
it`s comming time to REDmac or iRED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/new-red-brains/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20292#comment-451</guid>
		<description>28K: Looking forward to Mike explaining this one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>28K: Looking forward to Mike explaining this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/new-red-brains/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&#038;p=20292#comment-450</guid>
		<description>Alright, I just went to red.com and I must I am impressed and excited. This looks awesome. I just hope they can deliver what they plan on. Is it possible that I may even be able to afford a 3K Scarlet? Cool!!!

D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, I just went to red.com and I must I am impressed and excited. This looks awesome. I just hope they can deliver what they plan on. Is it possible that I may even be able to afford a 3K Scarlet? Cool!!!</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 12/13 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fxguide.com

Served from: www.fxguide.com @ 2012-02-08 17:33:01 -->
