Comments on: The Foundry’s 2009 Nuke Roadmap http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/the-foundrys-2009-nuke-roadmap/ vfx, mograph, and production news Fri, 18 May 2012 19:04:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Great Links to Click out to | Synaptic Light - a Journey in Filmmaking and Social Media http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/the-foundrys-2009-nuke-roadmap/#comment-585 Great Links to Click out to | Synaptic Light - a Journey in Filmmaking and Social Media Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:54:08 +0000 http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&p=20355#comment-585 [...] The Foundry [...] The Foundry

]]> By: Nuke vs Shake | Synaptic Light - a Journey in Filmmaking and Social Media http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/the-foundrys-2009-nuke-roadmap/#comment-584 Nuke vs Shake | Synaptic Light - a Journey in Filmmaking and Social Media Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:02:20 +0000 http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&p=20355#comment-584 [...] Nuke is moving forward with releases, and plan version 6 for next year [...] [...] Nuke is moving forward with releases, and plan version 6 for next year [...]

]]> By: ali http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/the-foundrys-2009-nuke-roadmap/#comment-583 ali Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:09:13 +0000 http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&p=20355#comment-583 4) normal relighting (and possibility to connect 3d lights and cameras) 4) normal relighting (and possibility to connect 3d lights and cameras)

]]> By: ali http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/the-foundrys-2009-nuke-roadmap/#comment-564 ali Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:55:30 +0000 http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&p=20355#comment-564 ...and my wishlist: 1) 3d shadows 2) 3d particles 3) zblur-convolve-vectorblur(oflow mblur) in one node …and my wishlist:
1) 3d shadows
2) 3d particles
3) zblur-convolve-vectorblur(oflow mblur) in one node

]]> By: ali http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/the-foundrys-2009-nuke-roadmap/#comment-563 ali Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:50:54 +0000 http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&p=20355#comment-563 What about interface speed? Nuke4.8 is much faster with a lot of nodes created. In 5.x mask shapes become very slow in large projects. ps: sorry for my english :-) What about interface speed? Nuke4.8 is much faster with a lot of nodes created. In 5.x mask shapes become very slow in large projects.
ps: sorry for my english :-)

]]> By: paul http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/the-foundrys-2009-nuke-roadmap/#comment-582 paul Sat, 07 Feb 2009 09:06:45 +0000 http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&p=20355#comment-582 The masterclass assets are available for download here http://www.thefoundry.co.uk/pkg_training.aspx?ui=CBC2593A-2C9F-4EF9-84BE-C198B0171453 The masterclass assets are available for download here
http://www.thefoundry.co.uk/pkg_training.aspx?ui=CBC2593A-2C9F-4EF9-84BE-C198B0171453

]]> By: Nuke vs Shake « Synaptic Light http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/the-foundrys-2009-nuke-roadmap/#comment-581 Nuke vs Shake « Synaptic Light Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:15:20 +0000 http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&p=20355#comment-581 [...] Nuke is moving forward with releases, and plan version 6 for next year [...] [...] Nuke is moving forward with releases, and plan version 6 for next year [...]

]]> By: phillip Gibb http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/the-foundrys-2009-nuke-roadmap/#comment-562 phillip Gibb Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:00:52 +0000 http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&p=20355#comment-562 I really like what the Foundry is doing with Nuke, they are laying it out there and saying to everyone that they are going to stick around. Unlike what has happened to Shake and it supposed successor Phenomenon. I am a Shake user but I have already downloaded the PLE for Nuke and I think that Nuke 5.2 is going to be the compositing I would like to switch to. Well it might have to be Nuke 6 because of budget and the fact that I do this for free for the Church. You go Nuke - show them the way. Phill I really like what the Foundry is doing with Nuke, they are laying it out there and saying to everyone that they are going to stick around. Unlike what has happened to Shake and it supposed successor Phenomenon.
I am a Shake user but I have already downloaded the PLE for Nuke and I think that Nuke 5.2 is going to be the compositing I would like to switch to.

Well it might have to be Nuke 6 because of budget and the fact that I do this for free for the Church.
You go Nuke – show them the way.

Phill

]]> By: Casey James http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/the-foundrys-2009-nuke-roadmap/#comment-567 Casey James Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:27:33 +0000 http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&p=20355#comment-567 "How about “How about

]]> By: demOOn http://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/the-foundrys-2009-nuke-roadmap/#comment-580 demOOn Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:04:38 +0000 http://www.fxguide.com/?post_type=quicktakes&p=20355#comment-580 3D particle and 3D track - are possible in current versions via external tools and scripts. But lens distortion based on internal 3D track look great. How about "Defocus(Convolve)/Moblur in one" node? Very old problem of all compositing soft. 3D particle and 3D track – are possible in current versions via external tools and scripts.
But lens distortion based on internal 3D track look great.
How about “Defocus(Convolve)/Moblur in one” node? Very old problem of all compositing soft.

]]>