Mike Seymour, TyRuben Ellingson and Matt Wallin cast away with Pi Patel and journey together to discuss the visual effects in Ang Lee’s Academy Award nominated film, Life of Pi.

For additional coverage of Life of Pi on fxguide.com head over and read Life of Pi: a tiger’s tale where visual effects supervisor Bill Westenhofer, from Rhythm & Hues, recalls his experience of making the film with director, Ang Lee.

Show Notes:

Director: Ang Lee
Cinematographer: Claudio Miranda
VFX Supervisors and Companies:
Bill Westenhofer — Production VFX Supervisor
Matt Shumway — Rhythm & Hues
John Rosengrant — Legacy Effects
Dan Schrecker — Look FX
Guillaume Rocheron — MPC
Paul Graff — Crazy Horse Effects
Michael Fink — BUF
Julien Aullas — BUF
Geoffrey Niquet — BUF
Christov Effect and Design
Casey Allen — Lola VFX
Edson Williams — Lola VFX
Scanline
Nvizage
Bluebolt

What is Beauty – by Matthew Collins

American Cinematographer Podcast with Claudio Miranda, ASC: Life of Pi

Mantra Rendering in Houdini and Houdini FX

Suraj Sharma — Pi Patel
fooxy porno

Irrfan Khan — Adult Pi Patel

Adil Hussain — Pi’s Father, Santosh Patel

CAVE: Cloud for Animation and Visual Effects


Thanks so much for reading our article.

We've been a free service since 1999 and now rely on the generous contributions of readers like you. If you'd like to help support our work, please join the hundreds of others and become an fxinsider member.

3 Responses to the vfx show #161: Life of Pi

  1. Regarding the changing aspect ratio you discussed in the podcast:

    Watching the film in 3D I noticed that they changed the aspect ratio from 16:9 to 2.35:1 during the flying fish scene to ‘allow’ one of the fish to fly outside the picture area. They also changed the aspect ratio later in the movie to something close to 4:3 to create a shot that looked like the book cover.

    Posted by Ieuan Attewell on
    • thanks – I did not notice the book cover one … good to know

      Posted by Mike Seymour on
  2. For a non-VFX person with yet an honest interest in the field, it’s always a pleasure to listen to you guys chat about a film, especially from a non-overintelellectualizing POV. You just learn just a ton of interesting things. The only thing I’d hoped to hear you guys talk about just because you have a profound knowledge regarding this, is the unusual use of 270° shutter angle by Miranda/Lee. I was even kinda expecting this to come up since at least Mike doesn’t seem to be quite fond of higher than 180° shutter angles, as he mentioned in the VFX show on “2012”.

    Posted by Matthias Noe on

Leave a Reply