Home Page › forums › Applications › Nuke › buying Fusion?
- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 6 months ago by ravi patel.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 27, 2008 at 11:09 am #202240jamiedParticipant
Hi. We may be buying Fusion and I’ve used it a bit so I’m happy. I thought I check here to see if there are any good reasons to get Nuke instead? It’s for broadcast – TV graphics, compositing, often quick turn-around. We have After Effects too.
Thanks
JamieApril 28, 2008 at 2:23 pm #216806hasegawaParticipantWell it depends on your pipeline. If you are using multichannel exr files, then Nuke would have an advantage. Otherwise I don’t see much difference. Furthermore Nuke is a film tool, not saying it can’t handle broadcast files, but you will find more options for that inside Fusion. The other thing is, that Nuke offers more options for creating fantastic keys. It has the IBK and Primatte included, so if keying is a key part of your job, nuke will give you more.
These are my thoughts 🙂
cheers
franzApril 28, 2008 at 2:26 pm #216807hasegawaParticipantWell it depends on your pipeline. If you are using multichannel exr files, then Nuke would have an advantage. Otherwise I don’t see much difference. Furthermore Nuke is a film tool, not saying it can’t handle broadcast files, but you will find more options for that inside Fusion. The other thing is, that Nuke offers more options for creating fantastic keys. It has the IBK and Primatte included, so if keying is a key part of your job, nuke will give you more.
These are my thoughts 🙂
cheers
franzApril 28, 2008 at 7:31 pm #216808ravi patelParticipantThanks for that. It’s kind of what I thought. I’ll bear in mind your comment about keying.
Cheers – Jamie -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
