Home Page › forums › Autodesk/Discreet › Flame and Smoke › How to fix a 360 degree jeryk pan
- This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by Marke Campbell.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 18, 2008 at 4:13 am #202549jayesonearlParticipant
I have a very jerky 360 degree panoramic pan I need to fix.
Is there anyway to average out the speed?I also thought of grabbing frames and stitching together a static images (which I did, it’s now 20,000 pixels wide) and then doing an animated camera pan but don’t quite know how.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
October 18, 2008 at 2:47 pm #217252Porter ColtenParticipantDo this:
It works great, even if you just project onto a sphere and refilm. Plus it makes you look cool, and gives you fantastic control.
October 19, 2008 at 3:47 am #217250cyril confortiParticipantif all you are trying to do is stabilize the shot, try the techinque for automatic 3d stabilization @ http://www.instinctual.tv
October 19, 2008 at 11:16 pm #217254Marke CampbellParticipantThanks I’ll give both a try.
October 21, 2008 at 9:38 pm #217253Marke CampbellParticipantBoth suggestions are good, however a couple problems still exist and the camera mapping created another.
1 The shot I’m fixing is a continual pan (Dawson City on the longest day of the year and the 24 hour sun )in a complete circle so I ended up with around 40 camera solves. ( The footage was shot by an inexperienced camera person but I think it was the image stabilizer that gave the footage such a jerky motion.
Some of the frames are out of focus which is why I thought it might be better to stitch together a still of the cleanest frames then do a animated pan over the still.
The video posted were both excellent, thanks
In the meantime I’ll keep working with the camera mapping to see if I can get an acceptable result
October 22, 2008 at 3:05 am #217251Porter ColtenParticipantGood luck! I think making a giant panorama could work for you as well. I’ve really enjoyed the camera mapping technique, but you may have a particularly messy setup to work with if you had to do that many solves. I’d love to see the result when you do figure it out.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
