- This topic has 12 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 8 months ago by .
-
Posts
-
in paint the default is to only paint on one frame. anyone know how to change that to paint on all frames?
you can’t.
You have to use autopaint. Do your paint and set stroke length to 1.
Maybe new versions have different options but I doubt it.
-k
ahhh. which then means i can’t ‘record’ multiple paint strokes (ie. clone a bit from here, paint away, then clone a bit from there, paint away) As then i would need to render multiple passes…
i guess you just can’t paint like in combustion… 🙁
tried painting in batch?
rohit wrote:tried painting in batch?Hi all,
Unfortunately, Painting in Batch won’t solve the problem of painting on a single frame. The only solution is the one described above, use AutoPaint of the desktop, eventually multiple times if you have multiple “effect” to paint (but you can combine all the “clone stuff” together… you can also access the tracker to track the Autopaint on features in the clip.Ventrap
“i guess you just can’t paint like in combustion… “
Well, thank god for that!!
Flame has the best paint around, DON’T want it changed.“Flame has the best paint around, DON’T want it changed.”
Do you realy think so?
I must agree with muiisal, Combustion has in my eyes the best paint operator. Especially the possibility to do a retouch orgy over and over again is a great time saver.wonderboy303 wrote:“Flame has the best paint around, DON’T want it changed.”
Do you realy think so?
I must agree with muiisal, Combustion has in my eyes the best paint operator. Especially the possibility to do a retouch orgy over and over again is a great time saver.It’s nice with the possibility to track paint strokes etc, but I’d choose flames raster paint over any vector based paint software. The feel of vector paint just isn’t good enough.
i like flame desktop paint a lot – though somtimes it would be great to have an option to “vectorize” a paint stroke – like the inverse of converting a graphics to an autopaint stroke …
i definitely wouldnt want a pure vectorpaint!ciao
robertpaul_round wrote:“i guess you just can’t paint like in combustion… “
Well, thank god for that!!
Flame has the best paint around, DON’T want it changed.I have to disagree with you, not all the vector paints are bad. I switched from DS to Flame, and I have to tell you that I’m highly disappointed with Flame paint for what I saw till now, still have to learn and I’m talking for what I’ve read from the manual and It looks really old to me…. and I thought that DS paint was old. You can paint with the DS paint using your pen and is pressure sensitive exactly like in Flame, only that is vectorial, you would not notice it if no one tells you, and you can paint over all the frames at once, edit your stroke, even edit your stroke and add a tracker to each point, too bad the track in the DS is so bad, you can load Illustrator files, keep the color and filling, not only the shapes, even the cloning that is described in this thread seems too difficult when compared to the same task in the DS paint, you just do your paints, combine them in one, and track it. And you can also clone from previous or next frames, or draw a shape and fill it with a cloner and then animate the shape. And if you don’t like vectorial, you just turn it off and have a raster paint. So it is not pure vector if you don’t want
I think that the Flame is probably the best, but some things in there can really use some makeup. I hope Autodesk have plans to update the paint tool.
ah muiisal wants something like strata media paint…where u paint on a live moving image in real time ?
victor is right as usual…i used to use the JALEO before flame and that paint module was WAY ahead of flame at the time, lovely tracking, live painting, fully customizable vector paint..flame paint is pretty ok but lacks a lot of tools that other softwares have by default
interesting to note that the JALEO had full multi-resolution array, and work flow in 1995-1996 😉
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.