Home Page › forums › Autodesk/Discreet › Flame and Smoke › Polygon mapping in Flame.
- This topic has 19 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 8 months ago by Michael Schlesinger.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 9, 2007 at 3:51 pm #215156Michael SchlesingerParticipantrobc wrote:yes
just tried, you where absolutely right, I don’t know why it did not worked before, I must be doing something wrong… now I even more happy… this will save me sooooo much time in a lot of things. Although when I use the same map as an internal map in Action, I see a bit of the seams of the textures on the polygons, but can be fixed retouching a bit the texture.
Thanks!
March 9, 2007 at 3:52 pm #215148Saran SirikasamsapParticipantwhich means u have to try and do some tests to see if u can adjust the mapping on the MAX side so that in flame u can simply use wrap…if thats at all possible 🙂
March 9, 2007 at 3:59 pm #215157Michael SchlesingerParticipantnop….. I did not change anything in MAX.. just loaded the texture into action… assigned as a texture.. selected warp.. turn off submaterial…
and that’s itprobably did not work in the first try because may be I selected the wrong aspect ratio in the texture when I imported it in Flame
March 9, 2007 at 4:18 pm #215147Saran SirikasamsapParticipantwell.thats all sorted now..try using expressions while moving these models 🙂
March 10, 2007 at 4:00 am #215154Michael SchlesingerParticipantWell, almost there, I got what I was looking for, but I think that the next step will require some help form Autodesk, I may be wrong, but I think I’m not. Let me know please 😀
Here you can see two examples MIB
EGG In order to get this quality of Shading, note the smooth shadows, and the light bouncing in the surfaces, I have to turn off shading in action, because all the shading was actually done in MAX, so all OK till here, but now, I want to add some 3D Text or some other objects that now I want to be shaded, but you cannot turn on or off shading selectively for different objects, only generally for the whole Action module.
I know that can probably be achieved using more than one Action module, but I don’t think it can be so hard to add that option to the actual Action module for a future SP. It would much easier to use this technique, and I’m really happy with the result. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
