Home Page › forums › Autodesk/Discreet › Flame and Smoke › title sequence
- This topic has 8 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by Martincito.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 2, 2005 at 5:48 pm #199903johnfxjhonParticipant
hi everybody, i’m a french compositor working on title sequence.
My machine is a flint 8,3,1 on octane 2, my project is in 1828 X 988 1/85 FORMATHere is my problem, i have tracked my type on the backround, i saw it on projection and there’s strobe effect, even if i blur it.
How can i do to avoid this
The probleme depends on the movment, when it’s scale towards us it’s ok but when we have an horizontal translation with scale and rotation it’s really problematicHave you ever solve that kind of problem??
Help me please and excuse me for my poor english
February 2, 2005 at 8:43 pm #209348patdawgParticipantDon’t worry about your English…it’s alot better than some native English-speakers. Can you give us some more info about your sequence? What is your framerate, and what type of projector are you using to preview? Is there any chance you can put a clip of your sequence on the web for someone to look at?
February 3, 2005 at 8:43 am #209342johnfxjhonParticipantSorry there’s no way for me to put a quicktime on the web
My main problem is on a dolly shot, the cam pan while she’s moving on, my type is
on the left side and she’s moving as she was part of the wall. if you want to picture it, it’s pretty the same concept that 13en ghost, when the actor is in the chair and the camera pan revealling all the room with the types on the walls.the projection: i don’t know th porjector, it wasn’t a numeric projection, the test were shot. One image done is one image shot, the i assume it’s projected at 24image per secondes. that’s all i cand told you
Thanks
February 3, 2005 at 3:08 pm #209346regoParticipantI have had similar problems before, i think the problem is because when the text moves from pos 1 to pos 2 , depending on the distance in between, there is a strobe becuse the frames are not enough. Try to do this same animation with more duration. i.e do a slower animation and then just speed up the result to the timing u need. it has worked for me.
Let me know if it worked.February 3, 2005 at 3:20 pm #209343johnfxjhonParticipantthat could work but my animation is quite complex with a lot of keyframes.
I don’t think i could do this then have the same movment.will try sometimes miracles happen
thanks from france
February 4, 2005 at 4:20 pm #209349MartincitoParticipantThat is an optical effect. The eye can’t perceive that sequence of frames like a movement. That is because the movement is so fast than you can notice the distance between one frame to another creating a stroboscopic effect. If you have in the original image any vertical line at the same position you should see the same effect than in your text. I don’t know if you can fixed without changing the speed. If you were working in video at least you could have the field option.
Sorry for my english too.February 4, 2005 at 4:29 pm #209344johnfxjhonParticipantI have tried your trick rego but it didn’t work Sorry
Thanks martincito, but i’m working in film no field can save me and i can’t change the time it’s an edited sequence
I’m doomed i suppose
February 9, 2005 at 11:54 am #209347regoParticipantI tried some tests, the only direction I see is to play with frame rate of the text, making a hi frame rate to the text gives good results. Probably thats the only solution. 🙁
February 9, 2005 at 1:19 pm #209345johnfxjhonParticipantCould you be more specific please
Thanks
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
