Universal Mastering and hybrid edits

Home Page forums Autodesk/Discreet General (Discreet) Universal Mastering and hybrid edits

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #203885
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I had an SD master rejected because it had hybrid edits. I do a ton of national spot work
    and have never had this problem before. Our workflow has always been to create a 23.98psf
    HD master, then resize to SD progressively and add pulldown. Has anyone else had this problem. The duplication house is DG in LA…

    #219449
    Romeo Reidl
    Participant

    They are smoking something. We work exactly the same way, and have never had a spot bounced for hybrid edits. We mostly ship to DG in Chicago, though.

    #219450
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    that blows! seriously, I have never heard of that. Honestly, I remember reading in a network Super Bowl’s specs one year that it was required that all NTSC Digibeta Masters have continuous pulldown. I believe this was in order to help the MPEG encoders remove pulldown or something weird like that.

    I work the same way you do. Resize, Add 3:2, play it out.

    randy
    mill ny

    #219448
    Romeo Reidl
    Participant

    I was a little nervous the first time a spot went out with a jitter-frame 2-pop or first frame, but seriously…no one has ever said anything, and that was ~500 spots ago.

    #219451
    Souya Minase
    Participant

    I work with DG alot, and also master at 23. I have never heard of anything being rejected for “hybrid” edits, but I (and the company I work for) always checks to make sure that the first and the last frames of the spot are not jitters (blended with black), and we also slate after the downconvert to the spot has been performed. This way you never have a blended two frame.

    #219452
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    its helpful

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap