Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 89 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Combustion Mac render queue #208935
    nanuk
    Participant
    zolo wrote:
    In my opinion, it’s an egregious oversight on the part of discreet that combustion, now in its third version, still does not have feature parity between its Mac and Windows versions.

    Come on, discreet, get it together. Either commit to fully supporting the Mac fully, or drop it altogether.

    -zolo

    That is true!!!!!!!!!!!!

    in reply to: Toxik/Strata/Mezzo at NAB 2004? #208091
    nanuk
    Participant
    SPRAWL wrote:
    sidewalksurfing wrote:
    i’m not saying the thing didn’t have potential, but there were several issues…
    v2 did help with some of the problems (no archiving!) but basic workflow
    issues like the “map view” which was an ineffectual schematic didn’t help…

    had some nice plug-ins though! javascript:emoticon(‘:wink:’)

    I´m still useing cyborg v2 and it´s great. much easier and faster than a flame or anything else availible from diecreet at this time. though i´m looking forward to cyborgs little brother scratch!

    Assimilate/Scratch will rule, no doubt. But I hope toxik will rule to. We will see when it gets its compositing part.

    Sprawl, are you working in Berlin?!

    in reply to: Toxik/Strata/Mezzo at NAB 2004? #208090
    nanuk
    Participant
    Guest wrote:
    finally seen it, and well, some cleaver kids have really done their homework. Speaking with 10 years film/tv compositing experience, I can’t see why this wont completely slaughter all the opposition… just beautiful.

    I heared the same thing on IBC 2004. And what i heared rules!!!

    in reply to: BLACK MAGIC with combustion mac/pc just to let you know #207968
    nanuk
    Participant

    Hi everyone,

    Iwould also say, that Combustion is crap on a mac – but at my office these kind of apps are all on Mac, so I got to live with it. Has anybody a workaround to get mac-combustion render on a renderfarm like you can do it with a PC-version? Because I heard, that discreet will not bring out a backburner for mac.

    THX Nanuk

    in reply to: more gmask questions #208648
    nanuk
    Participant

    I don´t think so. But I got nightshift. Perhaps I can play around a little bit.

    Are there many postproductions in Toronto?

    in reply to: more gmask questions #208647
    nanuk
    Participant

    Turn every Interpolation Curve to everything but bezier. FFI does not understand bezier and problems can occur.

    Where are you in Canada?

    in reply to: more gmask questions #208646
    nanuk
    Participant

    O.K. i use Inferno 5.5 and Combustion 3.01. I don´t know, perhaps there is a missunderstanding between the version? Sorry.
    Cheers Nanuk

    in reply to: more gmask questions #208645
    nanuk
    Participant

    I nerver had serious problems with exchanging gmask-data between the systems. And I often had more then one mask in a setup. Which Versions do you use?

    Cheers Nanuk

    in reply to: Gmasks from Combustion 3 to Inferno – Trouble #208598
    nanuk
    Participant

    I don´t think so. As I said: it works, but not always at the first time.

    in reply to: Gmasks from Combustion 3 to Inferno – Trouble #208599
    nanuk
    Participant

    I´m using it.

    in reply to: ASSIMILATE has acquired DIP R-evolution #208614
    nanuk
    Participant

    hopefully – cyborg was/is amazing!

    in reply to: Gmasks from Combustion 3 to Inferno – Trouble #208600
    nanuk
    Participant

    I have done a lot of rotoscoping in Combustion and afterwards transfered the Gmask-data to Inferno. The only Problem I had: keyframes were not always transmitted. But then i exported it another time and everything was good. Which versions do you use?

    in reply to: Importing Gmask from Combustion 3 in Inferno trouble #208573
    nanuk
    Participant

    I have done a lot of rotoscoping in Combustion and afterwards transfered the Gmask-data to Inferno. The only Problem I had: keyframes were not always transmitted. But then i exported it another time and everything was good. Which versions do you use?

    in reply to: Can effects be used inside an action? #208606
    nanuk
    Participant
    burgerdog wrote:
    It’s funy, because I have more trouble getting what I want out of Combustion. :p

    It is a little bit of thinking in two different ways. But when you get use to both you discover many things, that are the same.

    Not that long. Just keep on going. 😀

    in reply to: ASSIMILATE has acquired DIP R-evolution #208613
    nanuk
    Participant

    I´ve heard that the 5D guys are involved in that thing. But that is not for sure.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 89 total)