Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 69 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • summerJ
    Participant

    go with fedora. i had pretty good experience with it. i think 8 is recommended but take a look in the tec specs.
    dpx and exr should be faster then any other format. 95% of the work i do is based on these files @2k and txk is flying with it. the things seb mention are really to be kept in mind!

    nanuk

    summerJ
    Participant

    hmm, donno man. the comp does not look that complex. i dont have any issues. what are the files you are using. dpx, exr….?

    summerJ
    Participant

    hey antoine,

    i gave txk another stress test with cc`s till you drop, motio and blurs. don´t have your mentioned issues. what are the tech spec of your machine?

    nanuk

    summerJ
    Participant

    @fantasio 27305 wrote:

    We have tried XP64 but it doesn’t seem to be better. And we have been told by Patrick Turcotte from autodesk that running toxik under linux won’t resolve our problems.

    But I am like you, I don’t like vista and would really go for redhat rather than windows, but that is not my choice. Put more ram is also not my choice (I would go for 16GB at least…)

    Nanuk, have you done a lot of CC on your comp, like ten Basics CC one after the other?
    Do you use a motio node to add motion blur to the matte? How heavy are your comp?

    I am rendering localy, mostly with forward rendering. All projects files, footage&cg and rendered files goes to the server.

    Thanks for your inputs,
    antoine.

    hey antoine,
    if done heavy composting with txk (greescreen, roto, 3d tracking in reaction, cc, etc). motio at some points. not soooo often to be honest. donno if i had 10 cc´s in one comp but over 6 for sure. wasn´t a prob under rh ws5 64bit. i have 8 gb ram and a quadcore. fx 4600 as gpu. in earlier versions of toxik i had render issues but not under 2009. i´m not at the office at the moment. when i´m back on monday i will try to give it a stress test.

    all the best nanuk

    summerJ
    Participant

    hi we use toxik in a feature film enviroment. i never came across these problems you mentioned. but i wouldn´t go with vista. i was on xp 64bit and now im on rh which is way better. i saw some strange behavior under vista. are you rendering local or of a farm?

    all the best nanuk

    in reply to: Toxik: Linux or Windows #217349
    summerJ
    Participant

    @boyvin 27182 wrote:

    Hi! I know that Toxik 2009 for OS X will be release soon because Autodesk will be at the Macworld 09 with Toxik…if it can interest you…

    wouldn´t put too much in it. they will release, but to apples current “reordering” osx it is hard to develop on that plattform. if you want a quick and reliable box go for linux 64bit.

    cheers nanuk

    in reply to: Toxik: Linux or Windows #217348
    summerJ
    Participant

    @forilou 27175 wrote:

    Any experience? My favor would go for Linux for stability. coming from IFF too, linux have always been a plaisure to use. And system too, what are your flavour too: AMD, xeon?

    Many thanks Mathieu

    hey mathieu,

    i have txk on both linux and 64bit windows. my personal favorit is linux. it feels abit faster. but it is only a personal view. if you go windows definitaly go for 64bit. i´m on rh ws 5 and this works great. if you have an iff machine available you could throw it on that. works fine as well.
    hope this helps,

    nanuk

    in reply to: Flying flag ? #217268
    summerJ
    Participant

    hey,

    if you wanna do it by hand, did you try the ext. bicubic on flame? it is not the fastest thing to do, but you have full controll of your flag.

    cheers nanuk

    in reply to: Differences between flame and inferno #217147
    summerJ
    Participant

    i dont think so – as far as i know IFF and txk are incompatible. this is the reason why you cant exchange any settings. the algorithms are to differnt.

    nanuk

    @rohit 26321 wrote:

    i really wish discreet would merge toxiks features into inferno…like soon. including the UI gate into batch.

    in reply to: camera into toxik #217081
    summerJ
    Participant

    on which version of toxik are you? the general structure and specialy the structure of reaction is changing thru the version quite drastically. so if the script was designed for 2007 it is quite sure that i wont run with a newer version. also the way of 2d tracking/stabilization has changed. the general structure of txk is still wip. perhaps they found it with 2009. 😉

    nanuk

    in reply to: camera into toxik #217082
    summerJ
    Participant

    but i guess you don´t get “real” 3d information out of it. you get some 2d racking info. but havn´t looked at it for quite time. perhaps things changed.

    nanuk

    in reply to: camera into toxik #217084
    summerJ
    Participant

    i had some discussions with autodesk about that, but unfortunaly it is like it is. you dont have any maya at your office?

    nanuk

    in reply to: camera into toxik #217083
    summerJ
    Participant

    hi,

    as far as i know you will need a maya lic. cause the importer script is launching maya for some tasks. even when it´s only seconds.

    nanuk

    in reply to: the mising link for me in red workflow #217092
    summerJ
    Participant

    thanks alot mike!!!

    nanuk

    in reply to: rotoscoping #217031
    summerJ
    Participant

    thanks for that! i have some time by now and will give silhouette a try.

    nanuk

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 69 total)