[summerJ]

rohit wrote:

the new version of toxik supports AMD processors…hopefully lustre will too 🙂

yeah, i got the same information from a reseller yesterday.

nanuk

[summerJ]

uwe_wiesemann wrote:

Cologne…. curiosity killed the cat….
vielleicht trifft man sich ja mal.
Gruss Uwe Wiesemann

It´s a small world! 😀

[summerJ]

Hi Uwe,

sorry, but that is not possible, because the project is wip. But i solved the problem. The matte is damaged. Its value is not 1, as I said, it is 0.996. Sorry for that. And this explains the strange behavior I guess.

I am located in Cologne, why? 😀

Nanuk

[summerJ]

azzazzell wrote:

sorry for the offtopic, but where I can watch those videos?

thanks.

http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/index?id=5561949&siteID=123112

[summerJ]

Try to make the edges of your footage softer. perhaps a cc will bring the hd closer to film. play with the colortemperature.

Greets nanuk

[summerJ]

TheStreet wrote:

Hi,

Unfortunatly this is not possible in Combustion.

Later Ken LaRue
Combustion Application Engineer
http://www.thestreetproductions.com

8O, that is bullsh%$t!

Thanks fo the reply Ken!

[summerJ]

jonhollis wrote:

Hi all

does anyone know if a combustion workspace can be transferred into a flame batch?

thanks
jon hollis

it definitively does not work. You can only exchange everything that is ascii based.
CC, Masks, Trackerdata etc.

Cheers Nanuk

[summerJ]

AlanEBell wrote:

I prefer Combustion to After Effects myself. The color corrector is awsome. For film work C3 or C4 is way better than AE in my opinion. On the other hand if you want a good cross between Shake and Combustion you should look at FUSION. This app rocks.

regards
Alan Bell
Handmade Digital

If your are working for handmade digital no doubt, that you like c*!
Sorry, you ARE Handmade Digital!

And i agree: fusion is a good tool.

[summerJ]

I´m using c* since one of its first betas and i think it is a very good tool. In my oppinion it is the best allrounder. If you have to do a pure motion graphics job, perhaps ae is the better choice. I hate AE, but because of its plugins it is apowerful too. And the way it treats vector graphics kicks ass. If you have to do a hardtothecore compositing job shake might be your weapon to choose, or if some 3d objects play a roll perhaps fusion or nuke is your friend. I think combustion is a good combination of nodebased and layerbased compositing and i like to switch between them. The gui is a lot better then the adobe way. That is one reason, why i hate ae. even the new version didn´t made so much better. The color corrector of c is great, like in every discreet product and i fell in love with selections. Need a multiple cc? No prob! Do some selections but only prosses one footage. and the selections even interact if you want them to. As you can see i´m a discreet kid. i´m also a ffi op. and i like them too. for frontseat operating. but if you have to do a film job, nowdays i would choose shake to tackle it. shake is a very cool peace of software. down to the core.

so, the discusion about what is the best tool will never end i guess. but this is because of us. the users. because every one has to find HIS/HER tool regarding to the job he/she has to do.

perhaps toxic becomes the “allmighty”?! but this will take some time i guess!

make the illusion real!

nanuk

[Author]

Posts